User blog comment:SpaceWeather/A Formal Assessment of a Pressing Issue/@comment-1874924-20131008064736/@comment-1844926-20131008111143

The things I said to Jake were off-wiki on my Facebook account, which cannot be linked as solid evidence. This per the reason that my accuser himself was caught in an off-wiki cybering scandal with two other users, and the other two got a ban for posting porn on a wiki while he did not-- but nonetheless, he was still involved.

Furthermore proposition 1 is probably the easiest, because Proposition 2 will not end well (that I am almost positive of for reasons I'll explain later) and 3 would fail as well because few users that I know of actually want me demoted.

People act like all I ever do with my chatmod powers is abuse them. I kicked (notice the "ed" which symbolizes past tense for all reading) people for fun because I have a sense of humor. It's funny that people get mad at that even when NO ONE had a problem with me promoting users for 30 seconds so they could take a screencap of the admin label on their userpage. I get yelled at for whatever I do.

And the reason Jake was banned from chat was for spamming. I banned him on the main wiki afterwards, as he'd been causing more problems, and then HE was the one to initiate our Facebook conversation where the events in question took place (I am by no means obligated to act with adminly conduct on my Facebook.) I then unbanned him after a day, and then found out (again on Facebook) that he hadn't changed his matter ("Nobody gives a fuck about spam" were his exact words) After this I decided to reban him, and as soon as I did that he was crying "power abuse".

A lot of admins and mods on chat are sick of being told they're abusing power whenever they make a decision. It's our job to make judgement calls, and if you disagree either message another admin (off the main wiki or not) and resolve it that way. But do NOT resort to an admin's personal profile to troll them.

In fact, I'm going to ask that we have a formal review of this no consider banning Jake for it. He initiated the Facebook conversation and therefore should be held liable.

Of course someone will find a hole in his though. Just my fifty cents.