User blog comment:Jkl9817/Let's make some frigging decisions!/@comment-26157209-20130925100525

Read through this last night while on the bus, so if I say things that are actually waaaaay off topic, sorry in advance, I don't have the best of memories.

1) I'm pretty sure anyways, that everytime an admin has tried to add a new rule, or a new rule was talked about on the wiki chat it was shot down. OR if it was introduced, it's not inforced whats-so-ever. There are some rules that are inforced, while others only every now and then if it suits whoever is actively in the room.

2)

3) The thing is that most users are bonded into smaller cliques, in some way shape or form. If only because most of the users have been here together for awhile now. So chatmods are more leniant to look the other way for users who they tolerate, rather than a user they don't. Promoting new chatmods could help but they will likely just continue to do what the current chat mods do. (Usually I'm an optimist!!)

The best thing to do would be for the admins to crack down on the chat-mods. The rules are the rules of chat, and all users should be expected to follow them.

4) The writing projects actually tend to drag people apart rather than together. As a number of users choose to not/can not participate in them. But the ideas are constantly discussed on chat, leading to spoilers or a dead chat.

Rhonda's Newletter as far as I am aware is open to guest writers, you just need to let her know prior to the first of the month?

I'm indiffrent to the wiki awards if only because in order to them, that would require people actually having read a number of stories.

5) My mind is too tired to understand what you wrote.

6) I've always had a preference for chatango. You could easily detect a sock, and you could just as easily go through the chat logs.