User blog comment:Rhonda the stalker fan!/Future of Sprink's Stories./@comment-3220924-20131118202613/@comment-1874924-20131119150016

Reddy, "Private wiki" is a contradiction in terms. Wikis are public by their very nature. Do you respect ownership of content or don't you? Reposting Sprink's content at this point would express contempt not only for Sprink's wishes, but for Sprink himself.

I never claimed nor implied that everyone else has the same moral and ethical standards that I do. If some readers infer otherwise, then that says more about them than it does about me. I will say, though, that I have nothing but contempt for "moral relativism", because the people who preach it invariably do so to justify doing whatever they want. The whole idea behind morality and ethics is that "just because you can doesn't necessarily mean that you should", so relativist ethics might as well be no ethics at all.

And for the record, I never said that I would impose bans, I said that people I was referring to would deserve bans. You do understand the difference, I trust? It would be pointless to actually impose bans because I'm sure we have at least one admin here who would be dishonorable enough to reverse them.