User blog comment:SpaceWeather/The New Annual Wiki Awards!/@comment-1874924-20131211051332

I have a few concerns about the categories:


 * 1) Most Detailed/Grammatically Correct lumps together two things that aren't really related. Last time, we had a "Best Spelling/Grammar" category, and I suggest we go back to that. "Most Detailed" could be a new category, if you like.
 * 2) I'm not sure it's a good idea to have separate quote categories for competition and noncompetition stories. Because we don't have many noncompetition stories, and most of what we do have are one-shots, we're not likely to get many nominations. Last time, we only had two quote nominations on the noncompetition side, and that year we didn't even have the comedic/dramatic category split. Your decision to allow older stories to compete might help with that, though.
 * 3) On the competition story side, Best Non-comedic Quote should be "Best Dramatic Quote". The current title makes it sound like an afterthought, and you use "Dramatic" for all the other relevant categories.
 * 4) In addition to the quote categories, there may be enough interest for a "Best Catchphrase" category. After all, a catchphrase won the competition story quote category last time, albeit only because it was an in-joke. A "Best Catchphrase" category, if you add one, should cover both competition and noncompetition stories, since I don't think our noncomps have enough catchphrases (if they have any at all) to support their own category.