User blog comment:Mister.. E./Sensable Arguments be Damned!/@comment-1844926-20130714133645

I agree with the blog but just to point something out so everyone who wasn't on chat doesn't get the wrong idea:

''Reddy, you're in no position to say Fire gets enough attention, your story easily gets the most views out of anyone, your character's talk pages getting an average of about seven comments, and your stories easily surpassing thirty before the first chapter comes out. Plus, you actively cancel stories.''

A. I never in any way, shape or form said Fire got enough attention. If anything all I said on the matter was "You don't get reader on a fanfiction sit, so what?" So I really don't appreciate you insinuating that my argument with Fire was basically trying to tell him he got enough attention, because that is FAR from the truth.

Secondly, half of the "edits" to my story's talk page are made by ME replying to people who commented. So that's about two-three comments for the average talk page, the same pretty much anyone gets. And I seriously don't appreciate how you're basically throwing the fact that people want to read my story in my face. Like Dyna said, people read what they want to. I am not forcing anyone to comment, they do so on their own. However, that is still not a valid argument against me, and I'd appreciate it if you'd stop acting like I have ANY control over that. Not to mention how much I've REPEATEDLY said I wish everyone got the same 6-7 person readership I do for most of the stories I commit to.

And everyone continually cancels stories nowadays, if that hasn't been noticed by anyone.

So I was not telling Fire "Shut up, you get enough readers". My argument was more about how he was treating people like crap last night, and I did not even mentioned readers once the argument derailed. So I'd appreciate if people didn't try to use "Reddy, you get readers" against me for everything, especially when it doesn't even apply to my argument and it's so etching I don't control.

Seriously, it makes me really made how you're seemingly turning my argument into some shallow-minded attack. It was nothing like that, and that blurb is pretty much the farthest thing from the truth about my argument.